LUDWIG v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
| ROGER LUDWIG |
| PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, HUNTER FREER, MATTHEW STEELE and ERIC CULVER |
| 1:2023cv00080 |
| March 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by MATTHEW STEELE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, HUNTER FREER. MATTHEW STEELE waiver sent on 3/30/2023, answer due 5/30/2023; COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA waiver sent on 3/30/2023, answer due 5/30/2023; PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE waiver sent on 3/30/2023, answer due 5/30/2023; HUNTER FREER waiver sent on 3/30/2023, answer due 5/30/2023. (Bradley, Scott)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Scott A. Bradley on behalf of COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, HUNTER FREER, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, MATTHEW STEELE. (Bradley, Scott)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ERIC CULVER, HUNTER FREER, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, MATTHEW STEELE (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7598353), filed by ROGER LUDWIG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (dmh)
|
|
Judge Susan Paradise Baxter added. (dmh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
