HARTMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY et al
| BRIAN L. HARTMAN |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) |
| 1:2023cv00233 |
| August 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Alan N Bloch |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Remark: The instant civil action has been marked closed as it was opened in error. The case had previously been opened as civil action 1:23-cv-228. Any further filings in this matter should be made to 1:23-cv-228. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (sms) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan Wilk on behalf of COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. (Wilk, Ryan) |
| Update Answer Deadline: Answer due from COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY on 10/3/2023 (nae) |
| Filing 2 Errata re #1 Complaint by BRIAN L. HARTMAN. Reason for Correction: Case number missing on original complaint. (nae) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7819737), filed by BRIAN L. HARTMAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (nae) Document re-filed as errata at #2 . Modified text on 8/9/2023. (nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
