BARNETT v. HONORABLE JUDGE J. MEAD
JOMO BARNETT |
HONORABLE JUDGE J. MEAD, D.A. JEREMY LIGHTNER, DET. RUSSELL, OFF. POTTS, OFF. STADLER, P.O. BAYLE, OFF. SZOSZOBEK, OFF. JOHN DOE, MICHAEL DEJOHN, ERIE COUNTY, ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT, PA BOARD OF PROB AND PAR, ERIE COUNTY D.A.(S) OFFICE and ERIE COUNTY P.D. (S) OFFICE |
1:2023cv00248 |
August 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Richard A Lanzillo |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Proposed Summons (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cel) |
Filing 6 Authorization permitting withdrawal of prison account funds to pay filing fee by JOMO BARNETT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cel) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by JOMO BARNETT. (cel) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JOMO BARNETT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cel) |
Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER FOR PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 9/8/2023. (dlh) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by JOMO BARNETT. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Summons, #3 Appendix, #4 Envelope) (cel) |
Filing 1 Remark: Complaint lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cel) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/30/2023) (ept). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.