WINKLER v. ANDRZEJCZAK et al
| WILLIAM WINKLER |
| THOMAS ANDRZEJCZAK, TAD ACKER and BOROUGH OF CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS |
| 1:2023cv00351 |
| December 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by WILLIAM WINKLER. (Dinardo, Nicholas) TAD ACKER, THOMAS ANDRZEJCZAK, BOROUGH OF CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS served 12/22/2023. No answer deadline set because Answer was filed at #4 . Modified text on 1/23/2024. (keh) |
| Filing 4 Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by TAD ACKER, THOMAS ANDRZEJCZAK, BOROUGH OF CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS. (Hanus, Emerald) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Emerald N Hanus on behalf of TAD ACKER, THOMAS ANDRZEJCZAK, BOROUGH OF CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS. (Hanus, Emerald) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to THOMAS ANDRZEJCZAK, TAD ACKER, BOROUGH OF CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS (Attachments: #1 Summons Acker, #2 Summons Borough of Cambridge Springs) (keh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TAD ACKER, THOMAS ANDRZEJCZAK, BOROUGH OF CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $405, receipt number APAWDC-8022725), filed by WILLIAM WINKLER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit) (keh) |
| Judge Susan Paradise Baxter added. (keh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
