STOCKTON v. WHEELER et al
| RONALD STOCKTON |
| CENTURION STEVEN H. WHEELER, LAUREL HARRY, SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN, SUPERINTENDENT T. MCGINLEY, B. SMITH, PSYCHOLOGIST (DOCTOR) AT SCI-COAL TOWNSHIP, PSYCHOLOGIST (DOCTOR) AT SCI-HOUTZDALE, PSYCHOLOGIST (DOCTOR) AT SCI-FOREST, P.S.S. CRISSMAN, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEPUTY SEC. R. MARSH, FORMER SEC. J. WETZEL and GEORY LITTLE |
| 1:2024cv00039 |
| February 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Richard A Lanzillo |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by RONALD STOCKTON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jd) |
| Filing 4 MOTION / Request for Status Update. by RONALD STOCKTON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bjr) |
| Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER FOR PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 3/6/2024. (dlh) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by RONALD STOCKTON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jd) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by RONALD STOCKTON. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Envelope) (jd) Modified text on 2/20/2024. (jd) |
| Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo added. (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
