DAVIS v. LITTLE et al
LAVEN T. DAVIS |
MICHAEL CLARK, JANE/JOHN DOE, TABB BECKELL, JANE DOE, PATRICIA THOMPSON, GEORGE LITTLE and DR. LAUREL HARRY |
1:2024cv00185 |
July 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Richard A Lanzillo |
Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Authorization permitting withdrawal of prison account funds to pay filing fee by LAVEN T. DAVIS. (jd) |
Filing 8 COMPLAINT against TABB BECKELL, MICHAEL CLARK, JANE DOE, JANE/JOHN DOE, LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, PATRICIA THOMPSON, filed by LAVEN T. DAVIS. (jd) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 5 MOTION for waiver of prepayment fees re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by LAVEN T. DAVIS by LAVEN T. DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (njd) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by LAVEN T. DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (njd) |
Filing 3 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by LAVEN T. DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (njd) |
Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by LAVEN T. DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (njd) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by LAVEN T. DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Prisoner Authorization Form, #3 Envelope) (njd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.