CANNON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| CLIFTON TERRELL CANNON |
| WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2024cv00230 |
| August 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Richard A Lanzillo |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 IT IS ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall serve this Order, together with the petition, upon: (1) the Warden of FCI McKean; (2) the United States Attorney General; and (3) the United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Service shall be by certified mail. All costs to be advanced by the United States. Within 60 days of service of this Order, the United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania shall file an Answer to the allegations of the petition. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 9/24/2024. (dlh) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by CLIFTON TERRELL CANNON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ert) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $5, receipt number 100000675 (ert) |
| Filing 1 Remark: Habeas Petition lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (keh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
