RESPIRONICS, INC., et al v. INVACARE CORP., et al
| 2:2004cv00336 |
| March 5, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Gary L. Lancaster |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
410
ORDER that upon consideration of 409 Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings, and in the interest of judicial economy, Clerk of Court is directed to mark case ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 8/27/10. (map)
|
|
Filing
401
MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 383 Motion for Summary Judgment; Judgment as a matter of law shall be entered that claims 21, 43, and 44 of the '575 Patent and claims 29, 30, and 32 of the '517 Patent are not ant icipated by the Younes Article; 386 Motion for Summary Judgment is also granted in part and denied in part; Judgment as a matter of law shall be entered that Invacare's Commercial Device does not infringe claims 21, 43, or 44 of the '575 Patent. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 6/21/10. (map)
|
|
Filing
378
MEMORANDUM and ORDER denying 364 Motion to Exclude the expert report of Jeffrey Orth, denying 360 Motion to Strike the declaration of Dr. Younes, denying 352 Motion for Summary Judgment and 356 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice an d denying as moot 376 Motion to Strike; Expert discovery is reopened for sixty (60) days, limited to the issues raised in the New Younes Declaration; No new expert witnesses shall be identified during this time period; Thirty (30) days following th e close of expert discovery, parties shall file any renewed motions for summary judgment on the issue of invalidity and any renewed motions for summary judgment on the issue of infringement;Any responses shall be due thirty (30) days thereafter. Any reply to a response shall be due fifteen (15) days thereafter; No further briefing will be accepted by the court, nor will any motions for leave to file further briefs be entertained; Parties are further advised that when filing documents under seal, they must include the title or a description of the document in the docket entry; If a party believes that the title of a document is itself confidential, it must so advise the court by motion. Signed by Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 9/18/09. (map)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RESPIRONICS, INC., et al v. INVACARE CORP., et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
