GREAT NORTHERN INSUR, et al v. GREENWICH INSURANCE
| 2:2005cv00635 |
| May 9, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM OPINION -- as set forth more fully in the memorandum opinion, the evidence of record does not show that either plaintiff discharged an obligation for the benefit of Greenwich. Plaintiffs failed to establish they discharged the debt for th e benefit of defendant, which is the second element of an equitable contribution claim, and judgment must be entered in favor of defendant. The other issues for trial need not be reached. An appropriate order will be entered. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 10/16/2008. (bjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GREAT NORTHERN INSUR, et al v. GREENWICH INSURANCE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
