WALTERS v. WASHINGTON COUNTY et al

WALTERS v. WASHINGTON COUNTY et al

Case Number:	2:2006cv01355
Filed:	October 13, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Pittsburgh Office
Presiding Judge:	Joy Flowers Conti
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 12, 2010	Filing 86 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 75 MOTION for Reconsideration re 73 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by KAREN A. WALTERS. The court reaffirms its previous order entered on March 23, 2009 with respect to defendants motions for summary judgment. Defendants motions for summary judgment are granted with respect to all federal claims. The court declines to exercise supplementary jurisdiction over the state law claims in this action, and those state law claims are dismissed without prejudice to the plaintiffs right to file the state law claims in state court. The case shall remain closed. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 2/12/2010. (bjk)
March 23, 2009	Filing 73 MEMORANDUM OPINION granting 57 defendants' (Washington County, Cathi Kresh, Jeanie Rydzak, and Tom Jess) Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 61 defendants' (Judge ODell Seneca, Washington County Court of Common Pleas and Washington County Domestic Relations Office) Motion for Summary Judgment, with respect to plaintiff's claims for age discrimination under the ADEA and for deprivation of due process under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's claims arising under Pennsylvania law, and those claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 3/23/09. (cal )

Date Filed

Document Text

February 12, 2010

Filing 86 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 75 MOTION for Reconsideration re 73 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by KAREN A. WALTERS. The court reaffirms its previous order entered on March 23, 2009 with respect to defendants motions for summary judgment. Defendants motions for summary judgment are granted with respect to all federal claims. The court declines to exercise supplementary jurisdiction over the state law claims in this action, and those state law claims are dismissed without prejudice to the plaintiffs right to file the state law claims in state court. The case shall remain closed. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 2/12/2010. (bjk)

March 23, 2009

Filing 73 MEMORANDUM OPINION granting 57 defendants' (Washington County, Cathi Kresh, Jeanie Rydzak, and Tom Jess) Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 61 defendants' (Judge ODell Seneca, Washington County Court of Common Pleas and Washington County Domestic Relations Office) Motion for Summary Judgment, with respect to plaintiff's claims for age discrimination under the ADEA and for deprivation of due process under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's claims arising under Pennsylvania law, and those claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 3/23/09. (cal )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WALTERS v. WASHINGTON COUNTY et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?