RUSSELL v. BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PITTSBURGH
| 2:2006cv01668 |
| December 19, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Terrence F. McVerry |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 46 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine 1: Calculation of Back Pay; denying 49 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine 2: Offset to Back Pay; and granting 53 Defendant's Motion in Limine No. 2: Exclusion of Improper Evidence of Economic / Wage Loss. See Memorandum Order for details. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 03/11/09. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 37 Motion for Reconsideration. See Memorandum Order for details. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 11/21/08. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. See Memorandum Opinion for details. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 10/21/08. (bsc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RUSSELL v. BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PITTSBURGH | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
