KAZAS et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
ELIAS P. KAZAS and MARIA N. HNARAKIS-KAZAS |
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE |
2:2007cv00652 |
May 16, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Gary L. Lancaster |
Taxes |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER granting 40 Stipulation of Dismissal; Action is dismissed with prejudice; Each party to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 12/21/09. (map) |
Filing 38 ORDER directing Clerk to mark CASE CLOSED, pending submission of stipulation of discontinuance. Signed by Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 3/23/09. (map) |
Filing 29 ORDER amending 21 Final Scheduling Order; Plaintiffs' Pretrial Statement due by 1/20/2009; Defendant's Pretrial Statement due by 2/10/2009; Motions in Limine, Proposed Voir Dire and Points for Charge due by 2/20/2009; Responses to Motions in Limine due 3/2/2009; NO FURTHER EXTENSION WILL BE GRANTED. Signed by Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 1/13/09. (map) |
Filing 28 ORDER granting 25 Motion for Leave to file a Reply Brief in support of Motion for Summary Judgment and a Motion to Strike Certain Documents from the Record. Signed by Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 12/15/08. (map) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.