PHILLIPS v. POTTER
SUZANNE PHILLIPS |
JOHN E. POTTER |
2:2007cv00815 |
June 14, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Donetta W. Ambrose |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 131 ORDER denying 116 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 116 Motion to Alter Judgment. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 6/30/2010.(sps) |
Filing 93 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 76 Motion in Limine. The Motion is GRANTED, to the extent that it seeks to prevent the admission of the entirety of Plaintiffs journal, or the entirety of the excerpts appended to Docket No. 88 . Plaintiff, however, may proffer specific portions of the journal at the time of trial, and attempt to lay a proper foundation at that time, as stated in the body of the Opinion. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 10/9/09. (ask) |
Filing 85 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 68 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 70 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 72 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 74 Motion in Limine; defe rring ruling on 76 Motion in Limine; denying 78 Motion in Limine. AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2009, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendants Motions 68 , 70 , 72 , 74 , 76 , and 77 are DENIED in part and GRANTED in part, as more fully discussed in the Opinion: A. Evidence of the Doc incident is excluded; B. Evidence of the Carol Eiseman and Lisa Johnson incidents is admissible; C. Evidence of the destroyed documents is excluded; D. Evidence of Arnesons thr eat to Eiseman is admissible, and Eisemans EEO complaint against Coles, is excluded; E. Evidence of the EEO complaint in which Arneson impermissibly shared his responses to questions, as identified in Plaintiffs opposition to Motions in Limine, is e xcluded; F. Lay opinion or conclusion testimony on the ultimate issue in this case of retaliatory conduct or animus is excluded; G. Plaintiff shall identify journal excerpts and correlating hearsay exceptions, and submit same to the Court and Defendant, on or before 8/24/09; Defendant shall file any written objections thereto on or before 8/31/09; and H. Plaintiff may place in evidence paragraph 8 of the parties 1999 settlement agreement. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 8/19/09. (slh) |
Filing 64 ORDER denying 61 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff is hereby granted leave to Amend the Complaint to set forth basis for jurisdiction with respect to breach of contract claim. Amendment must be made within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 7/16/09. (cha) |
Filing 60 ORDER granting 55 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 7/13/09. (slh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: PHILLIPS v. POTTER | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SUZANNE PHILLIPS | |
Represented By: | Christian Bagin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: JOHN E. POTTER | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.