MARSHALL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: YOLANDA MARSHALL
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Case Number: 2:2007cv00973
Filed: July 12, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Social Security: HIA Office
County: Mercer
Presiding Judge: Donetta W. Ambrose
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405(g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by YOLANDA MARSHALL and 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by Judge William L. Standish on 2/11/2009. (md)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MARSHALL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: YOLANDA MARSHALL
Represented By: Karl E. Osterhout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?