HEILMAN v. ALLEGHENY ENERGY SERVICE CORPORATION
Plaintiff: BARRY J. HEILMAN
Defendant: ALLEGHENY ENERGY SERVICE CORPORATION
Case Number: 2:2007cv01034
Filed: July 24, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Armstrong
Presiding Judge: Terrence F. McVerry
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 21 the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant, Allegheny Energy Service Corporation. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 10/14/08. (bsc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HEILMAN v. ALLEGHENY ENERGY SERVICE CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BARRY J. HEILMAN
Represented By: Neal A. Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALLEGHENY ENERGY SERVICE CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?