MORALES v. BEARD et al
| JOSE MORALES |
| DR. JEFFREY A. BEARD, B. JIN, DOCTOR STANLEY FALOR, DIANE MANSON and LOUIS S. FOLINO |
| 2:2007cv01527 |
| November 9, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Greene |
| Amy Reynolds Hay |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER denying 54 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 58 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 62 Motion to Withdraw the suit without prejudice; adopting Report and Recommendations re 65 Report and Recommendations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 3/11/2010. (smc )
|
|
Filing
65
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 58 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by DOCTOR STANLEY FALOR, B. JIN be granted, that 54 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff be denied and that 62 MOTION to withdraw the suit without prejudice be denied. Objections to R&R due by 3/8/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amy Reynolds Hay on 2/18/2010. (dgg)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 43 Report and Recommendation filed on December 2, 2008, by Magistrate Judge Hay; granting 19 Motion to Dismiss in toto and the DOC Defendants are dismissed as party defendants; granting in part and den ying in part 29 Motion to Dismiss; it is granted as to all claims except the Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim and the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection claim, both of which are based upon the Medical Defendants alleged denial of treatment for Plaintiffs pain. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 3/6/09. (smc )
|
|
Filing
43
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the Motion to Dismiss 19 , filed by the DOC Defendants' be granted. Further recommended that the Motion to Dismiss 29 , filed by the Medical Defendants, be granted in part and denied in part. It should be grant ed as to all but one of the claims, i.e., it should be denied as to the deliberate indifference claim that the Medical Defendants failed to treat Plaintiff's pain. Objections to R&R due by 12/19/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amy Reynolds Hay on 12/2/2008. (dgg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
