BABISH v. SEGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. et al
| ALAN BABISH |
| SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. and PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. |
| 2:2007cv01539 |
| November 13, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| William L. Standish |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 54 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 56 Motion to Alter Judgment as explained therein. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 10/2/09. (mh, )
|
|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 49 Motion for Attorney Fees as described therein. Defendants shall pay to Plaintiff counsel fees of $53,265.50 and expenses of $538.51. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 7/22/09. (mh, )
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion to Strike ; granting 37 Sealed Motion ; denying 25 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment and remanding to Defendants to calculate and award LTD benefits in accordance with this Order; Plaintiff may file petition for counsel fees by March 23, 2009. Defendants to respond 20 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 3/2/09. (mh ) Modified on 3/3/2009. (jsp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
