TEGG CORPORATION v. BECKSTROM ELECTRIC CO. et al
TEGG CORPORATION |
BECKSTROM ELECTRIC CO. and EXTENSIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
2:2008cv00435 |
April 1, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Nora Barry Fischer |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 101 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for the reasons more fully stated in said Opinion, Beckstroms Motion for Sanctions 76 is denied. While the Court has previously found various pleading deficiencies in Plaintiffs Complaint and Verified Amended Co mplaint, it does not appear to the Court that the filing of Plaintiffs Complaint and Verified Amended Complaint constituted abusive litigation or misuse of the courts process. Simmerman, 27 F.3d at 62. The purpose of Rule 11 is to target abusive li tigation and deter patently unmeritorious claims. Plaintiffs claims are neither abusive nor frivolous. Id. Accordingly, the Court finds that Beckstroms request for sanctions is not warranted at this time. Fed. R.Civ. P. 11(b)(2) and (3). An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/10/08. (jg) |
Filing 99 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 60 MOTION to Dismiss filed by BECKSTROM ELECTRIC CO., and 63 MOTION to Dismiss filed by EXTENSIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., details more fully stated in said Opinion, An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/26/2008.(bk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.