MALARIK v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE et al
| JAMES M. MALARIK |
| ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, KATIE WEEKS, JOHN FITZGERALD, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY |
| 2:2008cv00576 |
| April 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| Francis X. Caiazza |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 11 of Magistrate Judge Bissoon as the opinion of the court. After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, the following order is entered: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James M. Malarik is dismissed, and a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 1/29/09. (smc)
|
|
Filing
11
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by JAMES M. MALARIK be dismissed and a certificate of appealability be denied. Objections to R&R due by 1/5/2009. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/17/08. (mlw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
