REVAK v. LIEBERUM et al
| FRANK REVAK |
| NATHANIEL LIEBERUM and BRIAN BARNHART |
| 2:2008cv00691 |
| May 20, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Fayette |
| Donetta W. Ambrose |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ORDER granting 50 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 9/29/09. (slh)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting 25 Partial Motion to Dismiss and the following claims are dismissed from the Amended Complaint: 1. Plaintiff's due process claim under the 14th Amendment; 2. Plaintiff's due process and equal protection claims under the 4th Amendment; and 3. Plaintiff's 14th Amendment equal protection class of one claim. It is further ordered that the conference set for January 28, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. has been changed to January 28, 2009, at 9:15 a.m. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 1/23/09. (slh)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss. It is further ordered that Plaintiff is to file an Amended Complaint withdrawing his due process claim in Count I and may make curative amendments to his equal protection claim in Count I. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is due within 10 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 11/10/08. (slh) Modified on 11/14/2008. (tt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
