EL-GANAYNI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY et al
ABDEL MONIEM ALI EL-GANAYNI |
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and JEFFREY F. KUPFER |
2:2008cv00881 |
June 26, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Terrence F. McVerry |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting Defendants' oral Motion for Reconsideration of Memorandum Order dated 11/20/08 in light of new evidence and granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count III of Complaint; denying as moot 11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying as moot 11 Motion for Permanent Injunction; denying as moot 13 Motion to Expedite; denying as moot 21 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 11/25/08. (mh, ) |
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 32 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 20 Motion to Dismiss Count III of Complaint. Counsel shall participate in a telephone status conference on Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 9:30 am. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 11/20/08. (mh, ) |
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 20 Motion to Dismiss as to Counts I and II and deferring ruling as to Count III. Parties shall file a supplemental brief on issues identified in Memorandum Order on or before November 14, 2008. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 10/31/08. (mh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.