ANDERSON v. EQUITABLE RESOURCES, INC.
Plaintiff: EDWARD ANDERSON
Defendant: EQUITABLE RESOURCES, INC.
Case Number: 2:2008cv00952
Filed: July 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Nora Barry Fischer
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 22 is granted (details more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/4/2009. (bdk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ANDERSON v. EQUITABLE RESOURCES, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EDWARD ANDERSON
Represented By: Brian P. Gabriel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EQUITABLE RESOURCES, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?