CROMWELL v. MANFREDI et al
| ANDRE LAMONT CROMWELL |
| MICHAEL MANFREDI, CARL MARTIN, JOHN C. PETTIT, PATRICK LEARY, BOWMAN, KENNETH WESTCOTT, SOUTH STRABANE TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF WASHINGTON PENNSYLVANIA, STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, SOUTH STRABANE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and WASHINGTON COUNTY PA PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE |
| 2:2008cv01048 |
| July 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Amy Reynolds Hay |
| Amy Reynolds Hay |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
ORDER granting 102 Motion to Dismiss; granting 121 Motion to Dismiss; granting 125 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED and the complaint is dismissed with prejudice as any further amendment would be futile. IT IS FURTH ER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, Docket No. 128 , filed on September 7, 2010 by Chief Magistrate Judge Hay, is adopted as the opinion of the court. Any other pending motions are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is to mark the case closed. Lastly, the court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/30/2010. (smc )
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER granting 39 Motion to Dismiss; granting 46 Motion to Dismiss; granting 79 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 90 Report and Recommendations. The Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a clai m upon which relief can be granted. The dismissal is without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to file an amended complaint on or before October 20, 2009 to include factual allegations sufficient to state claims. Failure to file an amended co mplaint will result in the entry of a final order dismissing this case with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Report and Recommendation, Dkt. 90 , filed on August 21, 2009 by Chief Magistrate Judge Hay, is adopted as the opinion of t he court, as supplemented by this Memorandum Order. Plaintiff is advised that he has the right for thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal in the office of the District Courts Clerk of Courts from our order dismissing his complaint. Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/17/09. (smc )
|
|
Filing
90
AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 39 , 46 & 79 be granted and it is further recommended that, pursuant to the screening provisions of the PLRA, 28 U.S.C. Sections 1915(e)and 1915A, all claims against all Defendants be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 9/8/2009. Signed by Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge Amy Reynolds Hay on 8/19/2009. (dgg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
