KIRBY v. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.
| MARY KATHLEEN KIRBY |
| J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC. |
| 2:2008cv01088 |
| August 5, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Allegheny |
| Terrence F. McVerry |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 66 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses. Defendant shall pay an award of attorneys' fees to Plaintiff in the amount of $100,778.48, and shall reimburse Plaintiff for costs and expenses incurred in the amount of $21,249.36. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 12/23/2009. (cdb)
|
|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT: Plaintiffs MOTION FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF, 64 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and Defendant shall: Reinstate Plaintiff to her former full-time position as a Custom Decorator with seniority retroactive to May 10, 2007, FORTHWITH. Immediately commence payment of front pay to Plaintiff, at the rate of $2,249.33 monthly (or $1,124.67 bi-weekly), for the period from November 7, 2009, until the date of her reinstatement as a full time employee. Expu nge from any and all of Defendants personnel records of Plaintiff any reference to her discharge, to any discipline leading to her discharge and adverse material relating to her discharge, and specifically any and all paper or electronic files reflec ting the information contained in the Reason For Dismissal document dated May 10, 2007 (as admitted into evidence at trial as Joint Exhibit No. 1). It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs request for an order enjoining Defendant from retaliating agains t her for her prosecution of this lawsuit is not warranted under the circumstances of this matter and is, therefore, DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs MOTION FOR BACK PAY AWARD, 65 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded back pay in the total amount of $56,767.18, to be paid by Defendant forthwith. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 12/11/2009. (kly)
|
|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting 50 DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION DOCUMENTS. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 10/29/2009. (cdb)
|
|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of EEOC Findings and Correspondence. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 10/26/2009. (cdb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KIRBY v. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MARY KATHLEEN KIRBY | |
| Represented By: | Samuel J. Cordes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
