SWEDRON v. BADEN BOROUGH et al
| ROBERT SWEDRON, JR. |
| BADEN BOROUGH, BADEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER JEFFREY D. OLSON, OFFICER JACK SPENCER, CHIEF DANIEL COLAIZZI and MARY SWEDRON |
| 2:2008cv01095 |
| August 5, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Beaver |
| Arthur J. Schwab |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's claims against the individual police officers and chief in their official capacity are dismissed, along w ith all substantive and procedural due process and Ninth Amendment claims. Baden Police Department is dismissed from this case as plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint abandons any claims against that sub-unit of Baden Borough. Defendants' motions to dismiss are otherwise denied. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 11/21/08. (mjl, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying as moot 18 Motion to Dismiss. Additionally, on or before October 1, 2008, plaintiff shall file his Second Amended Complaint; defendants shall file an Answer to Second Amended Complaint or Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, in whole or in part, on or before October 21, 2008. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 9/15/08. (mjl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
