WILLIAMS et al v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
DAVID L. WILLIAMS and CONNIE M. WILLIAMS |
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, FIDELITY MORTGAGE and AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY |
2:2008cv01160 |
August 20, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Insurance Office |
Mercer |
Donetta W. Ambrose |
Defendant |
Diversity |
28:1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2010, after careful consideration and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion, the Defendant Allstate Insurance Company's M otion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 43 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is granted insofar as summary judgment is entered in favor of Allstate and against the Williams with respect to the claim for bad faith. The Motion is denied ins ofar as Allstate sought the entry of summary judgment in its favor and against the Williams with respect to the claim for breach of contract. A Pre-Trial and Settlement Conference is set for May 26, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 5/17/10. (slh) |
Filing 29 OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT denying 17 MOTION to Dismiss Count II of 14 Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 3/10/90. (jlh ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.