A.G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
Plaintiff: A.G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC., ARLENE CULLEN and PAUL CULLEN
Defendant: TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, SHAWN A. PIKAS, DAVID C. DREIFUSS, JOANN BONACCI and DREIFUSS BONACCI AND PARKER
Case Number: 2:2008cv01238
Filed: September 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Nora Barry Fischer
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Notice of Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 165 MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that, for the reasons more fully stated within, the Court finds that Magistrate Judge Mitchell's Order (dated 4/13/10) is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). Accordingly, Defendants' Objections 157 to Magistrate Judge Mitchell's Text Order dated April 13, 2010 are overruled. Said Order is hereby affirmed, and adopted. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 5/17/10. (jg)
October 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 88 MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that, for reasons more fully stated in said Order, Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Travelers counterclaims 69 is denied, without prejudice to the prosecution of those claims in the action at Civil Number 07-765. It is furt her ordered that Travelers counterclaims in this matter, if they must be tried, shall be tried separately and after the trial on Plaintiffs abuse of process and malicious use of civil proceedings claims, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 13(i) and 42(b). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 10/30/09. (jg)
July 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MEMORANDUM OPINION denying Defendant Travelers' request that the Court enter case management orders in the cases at 07-765 and 08-1238 providing for the initial resolution of the contractual indemnity claims in both cases and subsequent disposition of the remaining claims. Details set forth more fully in said Opinion. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 7/24/09. (ccb)
February 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for the reasons more fully stated in said Opinion, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 4 Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint 1 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. It is denied without prejudice as to Plain tiffs' claims for malicious use of civil proceedings. It is granted as to any alleged abuse of process claim. To the extent Plaintiffs seek to bring an abuse of process claim, they shall amend their Amended Complaint on or before March 4, 2009. An appropriate order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 2/13/09. (ccb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: A.G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: A.G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Represented By: Alan H. Perer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ARLENE CULLEN
Represented By: Alan H. Perer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PAUL CULLEN
Represented By: Alan H. Perer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Represented By: W. Alan Torrance, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHAWN A. PIKAS
Represented By: W. Alan Torrance, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID C. DREIFUSS
Represented By: W. Alan Torrance, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOANN BONACCI
Represented By: W. Alan Torrance, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DREIFUSS BONACCI AND PARKER
Represented By: W. Alan Torrance, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?