UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. FORNATARO
Plaintiff: UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant: DENISE FORNATARO
Case Number: 2:2008cv01301
Filed: September 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Insurance Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Lancaster
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice to the parties' right to fully litigate these matters in state court. Signed by Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 9/18/08. (map)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. FORNATARO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Ramaley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DENISE FORNATARO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?