LEWIS v. DELP FAMILY POWDER COATINGS, INC. et al
CLINT N. LEWIS |
DELP FAMILY POWDER COATINGS, INC., CLYDE C. DELP, DONNA DELP, WALTER A. DELP and CAROL DELP |
2:2008cv01365 |
September 30, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Real Property: Other Office |
Butler |
Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 76 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 46 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by CAROL DELP, CLYDE C. DELP, DELP FAMILY POWDER COATINGS, INC., WALTER A. DELP, DONNA DELP, 49 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by CLINT N. LEWIS. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 03/31/2011. (clh) |
Filing 66 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 58 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike 54 Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Concise Statement of Material Facts Regarding Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants' Concise Sta tement in Opposition. Plaintiffs Motion to Strike (ECF No. 58) is GRANTED with respect to the last sentence of paragraphs 7, 8 and 33 of Defendants Response to Plaintiffs Concise Statement of Material Facts (ECF No. 54) and Defendants are Ordered to file an amended response deleting this sentence from paragraphs 7, 8 and 33 on or before September 20, 2010. Plaintiffs Motion to Strike (ECF No. 58) is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 9/15/2010. (clh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.