LENARZ v. USA
Petitioner: JOSHUA VINTON LENARZ
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 2:2008cv01460
Filed: October 16, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Donetta W. Ambrose
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 1 OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT: AND NOW, this 9th day of March, 2009, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant's Motion to Vacate 73 is DENIED. No certificate of appealability shall issue. This case shall be marked closed forthwith. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 3/9/09. (jlh )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LENARZ v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSHUA VINTON LENARZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?