MISKOVITCH v. WALSH
Plaintiff: ERIC M. MISKOVITCH
Defendant: JAMES J. WALSH, ESQ.
Case Number: 2:2008cv01474
Filed: October 27, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Lisa Pupo Lenihan
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION that the 27 Supplement and 26 Amended Complaint filed by ERIC M. MISKOVITCH is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on April 22, 2010. (far)
September 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 09/22/2009. (jmb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MISKOVITCH v. WALSH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ERIC M. MISKOVITCH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES J. WALSH, ESQ.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?