THE HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSPECTION AND INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. INTERNATIONAL GLASS PRODUCTS, LLC et al
| THE HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSPECTION AND INSURANCE COMPANY and HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY |
| INTERNATIONAL GLASS PRODUCTS, LLC and FRANCISCO A. FERNANDEZ |
| 2:2008cv01564 |
| November 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| William L. Standish |
| Defendant |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
454
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 254 defendant International Glass Products, LLCs Motion to Disqualify Counsel - as more fully set forth in the Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 5/22/17. (mwm)
|
|
Filing
245
OPINION resolving 207 , 211 and 213 - the parties' respective motions for summary judgment. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 9/29/16. (mwm)
|
|
Filing
243
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 217 defendant International Glass Products, LLC's Motion to Strike without prejudice to the court's consideration of defendant's substantive arguments as to the propriety of plaintiffs' Rule 56 motion in connection with the disposition of the parties' pending cross-motions for summary judgment. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 3/24/16. (mwm)
|
|
Filing
188
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 180 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike defendant Francisco Fernandez's answer to plaintiff's third amended complaint. The parties shall proceed as directed in the Memorandum Order. Th e motion is denied to the extent it seeks to strike all averments and defenses to which Fernandez previously invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and/or seeks to strike responses to paragraphs 12-36, 38-42, the second sent ence in paragraph 43, 44-111 and all affirmative defenses. This ruling is without prejudice to plaintiffs seeking to preclude and/or bar the use of the substantive averments in these specific paragraphs and defenses and/or evidence advanced in conjunction therewith pursuant to a subsequent motion in limine and brief in support. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 1/9/14. (kak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
