TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. et al v. CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY
Plaintiff: TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. and TRINITY INDUSTRIES RAILCAR CORPORATION
Defendant: CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY (INC) (IL)
Case Number: 2:2008cv01709
Filed: December 16, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Lancaster
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER. Through an exercise of the Court's inherent authority, this case hereby is STAYED pending completion of neutral evaluation/mediation. For the duration of the stay, this case is and shall remain ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Administrative c losings comprise a familiar way in which courts remove cases from their active files without final adjudication. Administrative closure is a docket control device used by the Court for statistical purposes, and it does not prejudice the rights of the parties in any manner. As and when appropriate, any party may restore this action to the Court's active calendar upon application or by motion. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 2/21/14. (dcd)
April 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 73 MEMORANDUM and ORDER denying 54 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and granting 56 Motion for Summary Judgment, without prejudice to plaintiffs' right to assert its state law claims in state court. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 4/4/12. (map)
September 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting in part 36 Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; Parties to proceed as stated more fully in order; In lieu of staying matter, case marked ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED; Nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposi tion of this matter; Should further proceedings become necessary or desirable, either party, after appropriate compliance with the deadlines contained in this order, may initiate them in the same manner as if this order had not been entered. Signed by Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 9/14/09. (map)
February 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting 14 Stipulation for Extension of Time; Answer of defendant CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY (INC)(IL) shall now be due on or before 3/13/2009. Signed by Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 2/9/09. (map)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. et al v. CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Represented By: Leonard G. Ambrose, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TRINITY INDUSTRIES RAILCAR CORPORATION
Represented By: Leonard G. Ambrose, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY (INC) (IL)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?