RHOADES v. YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Western District RHOADES v. YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH

RHOADES v. YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH

Plaintiff:	BEATRIZ RHOADES
Defendant:	YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
Case Number:	2:2009cv00261
Filed:	February 27, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County:	Allegheny
Presiding Judge:	Donetta W. Ambrose
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	29:206 Collect Unpaid Wages

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 27, 2010	Filing 86 ORDER granting 56 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 74 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 7/26/10. (slh)
October 14, 2009	Filing 43 OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT: AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2008, it is Ordered that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to file a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 28 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion to Compel Return of Four Pages of Document s (Doc. No. 32 ) is GRANTED; Defendant's Motion to Strike Exhibit 1 (Doc. No. 33 ) is DENIED as moot; and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. No. 30 ) is GRANTED as to her First Set of Interrogatories instructions O and P and n umbers 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15; GRANTED as to her First Set of Document Requests numbers 3, 4, 5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27 and 31; GRANTED as to her Second Set of Document Requests numbers 1,13, and 23; DENIED as to her First Set of In terrogatories numbers 1, 5, 6, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35; DENIED as to her Second Set of Interrogatories; DENIED as to her First Set of Document Requests numbers 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 1 7, 19, 20, and 21; and DENIED as to her Second Set of Document Requests numbers 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, and 22. Defendant's objections are overruled for each interrogatory or request to which an answer is compelled. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 10/14/09. (jlh )

Date Filed

Document Text

July 27, 2010

Filing 86 ORDER granting 56 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 74 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 7/26/10. (slh)

October 14, 2009

Filing 43 OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT: AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2008, it is Ordered that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to file a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 28 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion to Compel Return of Four Pages of Document s (Doc. No. 32 ) is GRANTED; Defendant's Motion to Strike Exhibit 1 (Doc. No. 33 ) is DENIED as moot; and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. No. 30 ) is GRANTED as to her First Set of Interrogatories instructions O and P and n umbers 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15; GRANTED as to her First Set of Document Requests numbers 3, 4, 5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27 and 31; GRANTED as to her Second Set of Document Requests numbers 1,13, and 23; DENIED as to her First Set of In terrogatories numbers 1, 5, 6, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35; DENIED as to her Second Set of Interrogatories; DENIED as to her First Set of Document Requests numbers 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 1 7, 19, 20, and 21; and DENIED as to her Second Set of Document Requests numbers 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, and 22. Defendant's objections are overruled for each interrogatory or request to which an answer is compelled. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 10/14/09. (jlh )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RHOADES v. YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: BEATRIZ RHOADES
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?