ZION et al v. NASSAN et al
| DIANE ZION, TAYLOR HANIOTAKIS, NIKKI HANIOTAKIS, BENJAMIN HANIOTAKIS, RACHEL TAKES and DENA ZOULOUFOS |
| SAMUEL NASSAN, TERRENCE DONNELLY, DAVID HECKMAN, SHELDON EPSTEIN, FRANK PAWLOWSKI and TERRY SEILHAMER |
| 2:2009cv00383 |
| April 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
175
MEMORANDUM OPINION Denying 165 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as set forth more fully within. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 6/27/2012. (cal )
|
|
Filing
162
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: Defendant Samuel Nassan's first motion for reconsideration and second motion for sanctions [ECF Nos. 122 & 144] are DENIED; that his second motion for reconsideration [ECF No. 160] is GRANTED to the extent that i t requests that the materials submitted for in camera review be preserved and DENIED in all other respects; and that his motion for an order declaring "certain allegations set forth" in his answer to be deemed admitted [ECF No. 141] is GRAN TED to the extent that it seeks an extension of the deadline for the filing of motions for judgment on the pleadings, GRANTED IN PART with respect to paragraph 28 of the "additional qualified immunity allegations" (and the responses thereto ), and DENIED in all other respects. Plaintiffs are GRANTED leave to amend their responses to Defendant's "additional qualified immunity allegations" for the purpose of bringing them into conformity with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(b). An amended reply must be filed no later than September 14, 2011. Any motion for judgment on the pleadings must be filed no later than twenty days thereafter. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/25/2011. (cal )
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER denying 87 Trooper Samuel Nassan's Motion for Reconsideration; denying 88 Motion for Reconsideration filed by Commissioner Frank Pawlowski, Major Terry Seilhamer, Captain Sheldon Epstein, and Lieutenant David Heckman; and denying 89 Sergeant Terence Donnelly's Motion for Reconsideration as set forth more fully within. Defendants shall file answers to the amended complaint by November 11, 2010, and that, within twenty-one days of the filing of the answers, plaintiffs must f ile a reply responding to the factual allegations in the answers. This ruling is without prejudice to defendants ability to file motions for judgment on the pleadings with respect to qualified immunity after plaintiffs reply to the answers. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 10/21/2010. (cal )
|
|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 73 MOTION to Dismiss filed by DAVID HECKMAN, SHELDON EPSTEIN, TERRY SEILHAMER, FRANK PAWLOWSKI, 70 MOTION to Dismiss filed by TERRENCE DONNELLY, 71 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by SAMUEL NASSA N, 63 MOTION for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 filed by SAMUEL NASSAN. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order, the motions to dismiss are denied, and the motion to enforce sanctions is denied. THE COURT HEREB Y ORDERS that the motion to dismiss amended complaint filed by Nassan [Doc. No. 71], the motion to dismiss amended complaint filed by Donnelly [Doc. No. 70], and the motion to dismiss filed by supervisory defendants [Doc. No. 73] are DENIED. IT IS F URTHER ORDERED that the motion to enforce sanctions filed by Nassan [Doc. No. 63] is DENIED. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that defendants shall file answers to the amended complaint by August 13, 2010, and that, within twenty-one days of the filing of the answers, plaintiffs must file a reply responding to the factual allegations in the answers. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 7/23/2010. (bjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
