TEDFORD v. BEARD et al
| DON TEDFORD |
| JEFFREY A. BEARD, LOUIS S. FOLINO and FRANKLIN J. TENNIS |
| 2:2009cv00409 |
| April 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus Office |
| Greene |
| Terrence F. McVerry |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
197
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 143 Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery. Petitioner shall file a memorandum of law in support of the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by 1/30/2015, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 9/29/2014. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion for Discovery. The motion is GRANTED with respect to Petitioner's request in 7(x) for any previously undisclosed police reports regarding the "further investigation" referenced in the affidavit of probable cause. Respondents shall produce any such documents, if they exist, to counsel for Petitioner on or before OCTOBER 19, 2010. Petitioner's motion is DENIED in all other respects. It is further ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for an evidentiary hearing is due on or before November 23, 2010. The response to the motion for an evidentiary hearing is due on or before December 28, 2010. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 09/28/10. (jpe)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
