DELKER v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER ("CO") BLAKER et al
| DANIEL DELKER |
| CORRECTIONS OFFICER ("CO") BLAKER, PLUCK, ESPEROKI and KING |
| 2:2009cv00710 |
| June 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Adams |
| Cathy Bissoon |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 87 Plaintiff's motion in limine to exclude irrelevant and prejudicial evidence related to Plaintiff's criminal and institutional history is GRANTED in part, and DENIED without prejudice in part. IT IS FURTHER OR DERED that 89 Plaintiff's motion in limine to exclude testimony of defensive tactics training witnesses and exhibits is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and DENIED without prejudice in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 91 Plaintiff's mo tion in limine to exclude testimony and exhibits pertaining to Plaintiff's conduct during the transport from SCI Somerset to SCI Greene is DENIED in part, and DENIED without prejudice in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 93 Defendant Grainey&# 039;s motion in limine is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 95 Defendants Blaker and King's motion in limine is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part. As more fully stated in the Order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 3/01/2012. (dad)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER denying 60 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Grainey, as more fully stated in the Order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 08/22/2011. (dad)
|
|
Filing
71
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 54 motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Blaker, King, and Pluck is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that summary judgment is GRANTED to Defendants Pluck and Blaker with respect to Plaintiffs failure to intervene claims. This disposes of all claims against Defendant Pluck. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a ruling on Plaintiffs conspiracy claim is deferred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this 54 motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs claims that Defendants King and Blaker directly engaged in the excessive use of force, and in all other respects. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 6/30/2011. (dad)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
