MILLER v. MELLON LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN et al
ARLENE MILLER |
MELLON LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, CORPORATE BENEFITS COMMITTEE, SHEILA MILLER, LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, CIGNA CORPORATION, MELLON BANK, N.A., MELLON FINANCIAL CORPORATION and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION |
2:2009cv01166 |
August 28, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
Plaintiff |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1145 E.R.I.S.A. |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 72 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 57 First MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ARLENE MILLER, 54 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by MELLON LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, GLOBAL HEAD OF COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 09/15/2011. (ndf) |
Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by MELLON LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, MELLON FINANCIAL CORPORATION, CORPORATE BENEFITS COMMITTEE, MELLON BANK, N.A., THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION, SHEILA MILLER, 34 First MOTION for Le ave to File Amended Complaint filed by ARLENE MILLER, 23 MOTION to Dismiss re 1 Complaint, MOTION to Dismiss re 1 Complaint, MOTION to Dismiss re 1 Complaint, filed by CIGNA CORPORATION, LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 6/25/10. (clh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.