MANOR INVESTMENTS LTD. v. PHARMACY OPERATIONS, INC. et al
MANOR INVESTMENTS LTD. |
PHARMACY OPERATIONS, INC., MEDICINE SHOPPE INTERNATIONAL, INC., CARDINAL HEALTH COMPANY INC and COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL TURLEY MARTIN TUCKER, INC |
2:2009cv01178 |
August 31, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Joy Flowers Conti |
Plaintiff |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER granting 25 Motion to Remand. As set forth in this Court's ORDER dated 3/19/2010, all plaintiff's claims asserted under state law are REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County, Pennsylvania, FORTHWITH. Plaintiff's federal claims contained in the Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. On or before March 31, 2010 Defendants shall file a notice of costs and fees, detailing the costs and fees incurred as a result of the removal. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to s how cause on or before April 14, 2010 why the costs and actual expenses, including attorneys fees, incurred by Defendants as a result of the removal due to Plaintiff's careless pleadings should not be paid by Plaintiff. The court will retain jurisdiction over the determination and awarding of costs and expenses. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 03/19/2010. (lbk) Modified on 3/22/2010. (jsp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.