HAJEL v. ALLEGHENY LUDLUM
| TODD HAJEL |
| ALLEGHENY LUDLUM |
| 2:2010cv00137 |
| January 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Butler |
| David S. Cercone |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting the 5 Motion to Dismiss filed on behalf of Defendant, Allegheny Ludlum. Order to follow. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 5/25/10. (jmc) Modified on 5/26/2010 to add document linkage. (ept)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HAJEL v. ALLEGHENY LUDLUM | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TODD HAJEL | |
| Represented By: | Neal A. Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ALLEGHENY LUDLUM | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
