UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUGHES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUGHES

Plaintiff:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:	STEPHEN D. HUGHES
Case Number:	2:2010cv00150
Filed:	February 2, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Pittsburgh Office
County:	Westmoreland
Presiding Judge:	Gary L. Lancaster
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Recovery Student Loan
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 25, 2011	Filing 11 ORDER granting 9 Application for Writ of Garnishment; Clerk shall issue a Writ of Garnishment directed to Lisa Hughes a/k/a Lisa M. Hughes d/b/a Steve's Auto Service d/b/a Steve's Auto Service and Collision. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 2/25/11. (map)
April 18, 2010	Filing 8 ORDER granting 5 Motion for Default Judgment; Default judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiff, United States of America, and against defendant, STEPHEN D. HUGHES a/k/a STEVE D. HUGHES a/k/a STEVE HUGHES, in the amount of $14,813.05, w ith interest on the principal sum from 10/30/2009, at 10.00% per annum to the date of judgment, plus interest on the total judgment at the legal rate thereafter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1961 until paid; Plaintiff is further awarded the costs of process server fees incurred in serving post-judgment executions and discovery and the Clerk shall tax them as costs; Defendant is encouraged to contact counsel for the United States to make voluntary payment arrangements. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 4/16/10. (map)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 25, 2011

Filing 11 ORDER granting 9 Application for Writ of Garnishment; Clerk shall issue a Writ of Garnishment directed to Lisa Hughes a/k/a Lisa M. Hughes d/b/a Steve's Auto Service d/b/a Steve's Auto Service and Collision. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 2/25/11. (map)

April 18, 2010

Filing 8 ORDER granting 5 Motion for Default Judgment; Default judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiff, United States of America, and against defendant, STEPHEN D. HUGHES a/k/a STEVE D. HUGHES a/k/a STEVE HUGHES, in the amount of $14,813.05, w ith interest on the principal sum from 10/30/2009, at 10.00% per annum to the date of judgment, plus interest on the total judgment at the legal rate thereafter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1961 until paid; Plaintiff is further awarded the costs of process server fees incurred in serving post-judgment executions and discovery and the Clerk shall tax them as costs; Defendant is encouraged to contact counsel for the United States to make voluntary payment arrangements. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 4/16/10. (map)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUGHES
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By:	Gary W. Darr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: STEPHEN D. HUGHES
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?