UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. EBSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FLFMC, LLC. |
| EBSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. and PLASTICS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORP. |
| 2:2010cv00231 |
| February 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Robert C. Mitchell |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1355 Petition for Return of Property |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER adopting 51 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court, denying 46 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, and granting 46 Alternative Motion to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, Fort Smith Division, forthwith. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 3/2/11. (map)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER directing that, upon consideration of 26 Joint Stipulation to Stay Proceedings, 9 MOTION to Dismiss or to Change Venue is dismissed without prejudice; 17 MOTION to Dismiss is dismissed, without prejudice, and alternate Motion to Stay Proc eedings is granted; Clerk is to mark case ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED and parties are required to notify the Court within seven (7) days of the outcome of the appeal in the case of Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers, currently pending before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 8/25/10. (map)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
