PENNAVARIA v. WALTON et al
Plaintiff: THOMAS J. PENNAVARIA
Defendant: JOHN R. WALTON, STEVE CMAR, SGT. RICHARD PLANEY, ROBERT BILLER, NAPHCARE, INC., LEE HARRISON, WILLIAM NICHOLSON, LINDA RIGGIN and RHONDA GASKILL
Case Number: 2:2010cv00415
Filed: March 29, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Schwab
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 78 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 71 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by WESTMORELAND COUNTY, 64 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ROBERT BILLER, 67 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by JOHN R. WALTON, SGT. RICHARD PLANEY, STEVE CMAR, 73 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by LINDA RIGGIN, RHONDA GASKILL, LEE HARRISON, NAPHCARE, INC., WILLIAM NICHOLSON. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 12/30/2010. (lmt)
November 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER denying 53 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 11/04/10. (mjl)
June 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 19 Motion to Dismiss; denying 19 Motion to Strike ; denying 20 Motion to Dismiss; denying 20 Motion to Strike ; denying 21 Motion to Dismiss; denying 21 Motion to Strike ; granting 23 Motion to Dismiss; gran ting 23 Motion to Strike. 1.The NaphCare defendants' motions to dismiss at docs. nos. 19, 20 and 21 are DENIED without prejudice to defendants raising the issues set forth therein in a motion for summary judgment at the appropriate time follow ing discovery.2.The Westmoreland County Prison Warden, officers and employees motion to dismiss at doc. no. 23 is GRANTED with prejudice with regard to plaintiffs claims made in these defendants official capacities; and is GRANTED without prejudice t o plaintiff's filing an Amended Complaint naming Westmoreland County as a defendant and alleging additional facts against these defendants in their individual and personal capacities with regard to the actions allegedly taken by the individual o fficers and employees under color of state law that plaintiff claims violated his civil rights. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint shall be filed on or before July 28, 2010. Defendants shall file their respective Answers or Motions to Dismiss on or before August 11, 2010. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 6/30/10. (mjl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PENNAVARIA v. WALTON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS J. PENNAVARIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN R. WALTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEVE CMAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SGT. RICHARD PLANEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT BILLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NAPHCARE, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LEE HARRISON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILLIAM NICHOLSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LINDA RIGGIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RHONDA GASKILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?