UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE, LP et al
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ALCHEMY ASSET SERVICES, INC.
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE, LP and GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Case Number: 2:2010cv00680
Filed: May 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER adopting 50 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court and granting 28 Motion to Dismiss 26 First AMENDED COMPLAINT pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6); 52 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint is denied on grounds of futility, as the proposed amended pleading fails to cure the deficiencies in the first amended complaint, in that, in dereliction of Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b), the proposed second amended complaint fails to set forth facts with sufficient specificity to support an inference that the defendants acted with intent to deceive the public. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 6/17/11. (map)
December 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER adopting in part 19 Report and Recommendation; Plaintiff has leave to amend complaint within fourteen (14) days, and that application for dismissal of the action may be made if a timely amendment is not forthcoming within that time; If the pl aintiff does not desire to amend, he may file an appropriate notice with the district court asserting his intent to stand on the complaint, at which time an order to dismiss the action would be appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 12/20/10. (map)
November 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Recommending that Defendants' 6 Motion to Dismiss Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) be granted. Objections to R&R are due by 12/3/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell on 11/16/2010. (mlb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE, LP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ALCHEMY ASSET SERVICES, INC.
Represented By: Scott Michael Hare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?