SHANER v. MCGRADY
Petitioner: ROBERT RAY SHANER
Respondent: MCGRADY
Case Number: 2:2010cv00859
Filed: June 28, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Luzerne
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Mitchell
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by ROBERT RAY SHANER concluding that the petition should be dismissed and that a certificate of appealability should be denied. Petitioner has fourteen days to show why judgment should not be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert C. Mitchell on 07/13/2010. (Mitchell, Robert)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHANER v. MCGRADY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ROBERT RAY SHANER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MCGRADY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?