LUTZ v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: NORMA J. LUTZ
Defendant: MICHAEL ASTRUE
Case Number: 2:2010cv01268
Filed: September 27, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Beaver
Presiding Judge: Nora Barry Fischer
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons stated more fully within, reversal or remand of the ALJs decision is not supported. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment 7 is denied, Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 11 is granted, and the decision of the ALJ is affirmed. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 4/5/11. (jg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LUTZ v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NORMA J. LUTZ
Represented By: James R. Burn, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?