MCCLENDON v. DOUGHERTY et al
Plaintiff: KELLEN MCCLENDON
Defendant: CHARLES J. DOUGHERTY, RALPH L. PEARSON and DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY
Case Number: 2:2010cv01339
Filed: October 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Lancaster
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 99 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons stated more fully within, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel AALS to Produce Documents Pursuant to Subpoena Duces Tecum and to Compel Defendants to Produce Documents Pursuant to Request for Production 84 is denied. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 10/19/11. (jg)
September 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 90 MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, 79 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is denied. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/15/11. (jg)
July 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons stated more fully within, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 51 is hereby granted consistent with the terms of this Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 7/28/11. (jg)
May 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that, for reasons stated within, 34 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and 45 Plaintiff's Suppemental Motion to Compel Discovery are denied. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 5/23/11. (jg)
February 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons stated more fully within, the Court grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Certain Claims 5 and thus Plaintiff's claims for Defendant's failure to consider his application for the positio n of Duquesne University School of Law ("law school") dean during the 2004-2005 decanal search on the basis of race, any claim based on the Law School decanal search that took place in 2009-2010, claims of hostile work environment and claims for failure to investigate are dismissed, with prejudice. Plaintiff, if he chooses to do so, may file an amended complaint on or before 3/7/11. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 2/15/11. (jg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCCLENDON v. DOUGHERTY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KELLEN MCCLENDON
Represented By: David J. Millstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHARLES J. DOUGHERTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RALPH L. PEARSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?