LYTTLE v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF PENNSYLVANIA, L.L.C.
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CONSTANCE LYTTLE
Defendant: AT&T CORPORATION
Case Number: 2:2010cv01376
Filed: October 19, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Mercer
Presiding Judge: Nora Barry Fischer
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 112 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 111 Unopposed Motion of the United States to Vacate the November 15, 2012 Report and Recommendation, and the Memorandum Orders of December 28, 2012 and January 15, 2013 (details more fully stated in said Memorandum Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/13/2013. (bdk)
December 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER indicating that after the Plaintiff/Relator, Constance Lyttle, individually and on behalf of the United States of America, filed an Amended Complaint in the above-captioned case, and after the United States filed a Complaint in Intervention, an d after motions to dismiss both complaints were submitted by the Defendant, AT&T Corporation, a/k/a AT&T Accessible Communication Services, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a p eriod of time after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, upon consideration of the objections filed by all of the parties (ECF Nos. 73, 74, 75), the respective responses thereto (ECF Nos. 76, 78, 79), the reply by the United S tates (Docket No. 80-1) and upon independent review of the motions and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 70 ), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint in Intervention of the United States filed by Defendant (ECF No. 44 ) is denied; the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint of Plaintiff/Relator filed by Defendant (ECF No. 47 ) is granted with respect to Counts II, III, IV, V, VI and VII and denied with respect to Count I, which is limited to the period between May 20, 2009 and October 31, 2009. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/28/2012. (bdk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LYTTLE v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF PENNSYLVANIA, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T CORPORATION
Represented By: Douglas A. Axel
Represented By: Michael J. Bruzzese
Represented By: David W. Carpenter
Represented By: Robert J. Conlan
Represented By: Sean C. Griffin
Represented By: J. Alan Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Jonathan M. Phillips
Represented By: Paul E. Skirtich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CONSTANCE LYTTLE
Represented By: Rebecca A. Lyttle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?