MCLAUGHLIN v. PHELAN HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLP. et al
TIMOTHY MCLAUGHLIN |
PHELAN HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLP., LAWRENCE T. PHELAN, FRANCIS S. HALLINAN, DANIEL G. SCHMIEG and ROSEMARIE DIAMOND |
2:2010cv01406 |
October 22, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Gary L. Lancaster |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 131 ORDER REOPENING CASE AND LIFTING STAY. Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 129 ) to lift the stay and reopen this case is GRANTED. Moreover, having carefully reviewed the parties' submissions regarding Plaintiff's class allegations, the Court is constrained to hold that, for the time being, those claims may proceed. The Court will hold a status conference to schedule appropriate class action deadlines, but, before doing so, the parties are directed to engage in settlement negotiations. B y 2/8/15, the parties shall submit a "Stipulation Selecting ADR Process." See form on Court's website. Further instructions are detailed in the Order corresponding with this ECF docket entry. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 2/11/15. (dcd) |
Filing 114 ORDER granting 107 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees. Attorneys' fees are awarded, in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, in the amount of $15,050.50. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 8/6/13. See Order filed with this ECF docket entry for details. (dcd) |
Filing 105 MEMORANDUM and ORDER denying 95 Motion for Reconsideration; A separate order entering final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule 58, as referenced in this Court's order of 9/7/2012, will now be issued; As a sanction for failing to fulfill their discovery obligations, and to obey this Court's order of 12/19/2011, defendants must reimburse plaintiff for all reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees, caused by their failure to comply; Counsel for plaintiff is to submit a bill of costs for all reasonable fees incurred in connection with the preparation of the motion for reconsideration, brief in support, and reply brief within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 3/11/13. (map) |
Filing 94 MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting 73 Motion for Summary Judgment; The Court will refrain from entering final judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58; Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to file a motion for relief from the Court's orders, dated 9/9/2011 and 12/20/2011; If no such motion is filed within that time period, the Court will enter final judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 9/7/12. (map) |
Filing 72 ORDER clarifying 53 MEMORANDUM and ORDER denying 39 Motion to Dismiss 38 Amended Complaint in that plaintiff's claims in the amended complaint asserted under 15 U.S.C. 1692e(2), 15 U.S.C. 1692f(1) and 15 U.S.C. 1692e(10) were dismissed pursuant to the Court's order of 9/8/2011. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 12/20/11. (map) |
Filing 59 ORDER denying 55 Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Order of 9/9/2011. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 9/29/11. (map) |
Filing 53 MEMORANDUM and ORDER denying 39 Motion to Dismiss 38 Amended Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 9/8/11. (map) |
Filing 37 ORDER denying as moot 32 Motion for Protective Order and 35 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and Extend Class Discovery Deadline. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 4/15/11. (map) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.