KOVACHICK v. VERIZON

KOVACHICK v. VERIZON

Plaintiff:	JANINE KOVACHICK
Defendant:	VERIZON
Case Number:	2:2011cv00100
Filed:	January 25, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Pittsburgh Office
County:	Fayette
Presiding Judge:	Gary L. Lancaster
Nature of Suit:	Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1001
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 22, 2012	Filing 27 MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting 19 Motion for Summary Judgment; Clerk of Courts is directed to mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 5/22/12. (map)
March 19, 2011	Filing 8 ORDER that upon consideration of 7 Joint Motion to Stay Pending Exhaustion of Administrative Review and Appeal Process, the Court will refrain from ruling on the outstanding motion, and in the interest of judicial economy, the Clerk is directed to mark this case ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED; Nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this matter, and should further proceedings in it become necessary or desirable, either party may initiate it in the same manner as if this order had not been entered. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 3/18/11. (map)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 22, 2012

Filing 27 MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting 19 Motion for Summary Judgment; Clerk of Courts is directed to mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 5/22/12. (map)

March 19, 2011

Filing 8 ORDER that upon consideration of 7 Joint Motion to Stay Pending Exhaustion of Administrative Review and Appeal Process, the Court will refrain from ruling on the outstanding motion, and in the interest of judicial economy, the Clerk is directed to mark this case ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED; Nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this matter, and should further proceedings in it become necessary or desirable, either party may initiate it in the same manner as if this order had not been entered. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 3/18/11. (map)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KOVACHICK v. VERIZON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: JANINE KOVACHICK
Represented By:	Neil J. Marcus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: VERIZON
Represented By:	James P. Hollihan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?